Economics and Benefits Analysis
Encourage your students to enter their abstract for the annual SRA meeting!
Frequently the EBASG provides $500 and waives the meeting registration fee for the best student abstract submitted and presented at the SRA annual meeting in the area of economics and benefits analysis.
Interested students should indicate that they would like to be considered for this award when they submit their abstract for consideration by the annual meeting Committee. To receive the award, applicants must be students at abstract submission deadline and must attend the annual meeting. Applicants may apply to multiple specialty groups; however, each applicant may only hold one award.
The Student Merit Award is completely independent from the need-based SRA travel awards given to students and international applicants to attend the annual meeting. Any Student Merit Award winner may also apply for and receive need-based student and international travel funding.
The award is presented at the EBASG business meeting during the annual meeting.
Esther Jose, University at Buffalo, “Public-Private Partnership of Prescribed Fires”
Abstract: Wildfires are an exponentially worsening problem throughout the world and are often managed using prescribed fires and other fuel management techniques. The effectiveness of these techniques are well established, and are conducted by both public and private entities. However, private entities are often discouraged from conducting prescribed fire due to a host of reasons including (i) lack of resources and funding and (ii) legal barriers such as liability for prescribed fire accidents. We propose a sequential game theory model with two players: public entities and private entities. The public entities decide the amount of resources they will devote to prescribed fires, and the status of the most restrictive existing laws surrounding prescribed fires (smoke restrictions and simple negligence laws), after which private entities decide on the acres of prescribed fires they will burn. We take into account the risks of prescribed fires turning into wildfires, as well as any increase in such risks with a change in laws. Both players aim to reduce their total costs and losses. Our research question is: What is the optimal partnership in these scenarios in order to maximize the overall economic benefit of both parties? Results show that when the risks associated with wildfires are high, it is beneficial for the government to reduce barriers and increase resources, and for private parties to then conduct more prescribed fires. We also conduct a case study on privately owned land in Oregon.
Marwan Alsultan, University of Virginia, “Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis for Access Reconfiguration of Transportation Networks”
Omer Keskin, Old Dominion University, “Annualized Loss of Revenue Caused by Cyber-attacks for Power Generation in Virginia Using Agent-Based Modeling”
Laura Bakkensen, Yale University, “Risk and adaptation incentives: Evidence from global hurricane damages and fatalities”
Daniel Herrera, Toulouse School of Economics, “To fortify or not, a structural analysis of the public advisory policy on folic acid in France”
Magdalene Matthews, Cyprus International Institute for Environment and Public Health / Harvard School of Public Health, “National Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Risk Factors: Cost Effectiveness of Proposed Environmental Health Interventions in a Recovering Liberia”.
Austin Mitchell, Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, “The Economics of Environmental Reclamation for Shale Gas Development in Pennsylvania”.
Seth Baum, Pennsylvania State University, “Space-Time Discounting, Global Catastrophic Risk, and Climate Change Economics.”
Niam Yaraghi, Royal Institute of Technology (Sweden), “A Model for Integrating Quantitative Risk Analysis of Vendor’s Environmental Performance into Supplier Selection Process.”
Christoph M. Rheinberger, WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research, “Discrete Choice Experiments: False Friends for Valuing Mortality Risk?”