Dose Response
Previous Teleseminars
Previous DRSG Seminars – 2017-2023
Gregory Addicks, Ph.D., Health Canada
7 March, 2023
Dingsheng Li, Ph.D., University of Nevada, Reno
1 November, 2022
Accelerating QA review of PBPK models: A template approach to model implementation.
Amanda Bernstein, Ph.D., U.S. EPA
13 September, 2022
Bayesian model averaging for BMD estimation: Extension of model sets and distributions.
José Cortiñas Abrahantes, Ph.D., EFSA.
7 June, 2022
Advancing the use of transcriptomic points of departure for regulatory decision-making.
Carole Yauk, Ph.D., University of Ottawa
1 March, 2022
A new method for characterizing inter-species toxicodynamic variability
Sarah D. Burnett, Ph.D., Texas A&M University
2 November 2021
Individual, independent, and combined effects of toxic metals and manganese on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Michael Borghese, Ph.D., Health Canada
Chemical toxicity assessment using high-throughput transcriptomics and next generation sequencing: A case study of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
Anthony J.F. Reardon, Health Canada
2 March 2021
Concentration-response Analysis of Image-based High-throughput Phenotypic Profiling Data for Chemical Bioactivity Screening
Johanna Nyffeler, U.S. EPA
4 August 2020 | Video Presentation
High-throughput Transcriptomic Profiling of Chemicals for Risk Assessment Applications
Richard Judson, U.S. EPA
5 May 2020 | Video Presentation
Recent Probabilistic and Computational Advances in Dose-Response Assessment to Better Support Chemical Risk Assessment
Weihsueh Chiu, Texas A&M University
4 February 2020
Cox Proportional Hazard Regression and Splines: A Cautionary Tale for Exposure-Response Assessment
Dustin Long, University of Alabama Birmingham
5 March 2019
Differences Between Scientific, Legal, and Public Policy Uses of Probability
Nathan Schachtman, Esq., (SRA Risk Policy and Law Specialty Group)
7 August 2018
The NTP Proposed Approach to Genomic Dose-Response Modeling
Scott Auerbach, National Toxicology Program (NTP)
7 August 2018
New Data for Dose Response, Specifically Using Toxcast Data
Richard Judson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3 April 2018
Machine Learning in Dose-Response Assessment: Translating Science to Decisions (Abstract)
Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 March 2018
Considerations for the Dose‐Response Analyses of Inorganic Arsenic Health Outcomes
Jeff Gift, U.S. EPA
3 October 2017
Understanding the Biochemical Origin of Sigmoidal Dose Responses: Ultrasensitive Response Motifs
Qiang Zhang, Emory University
5 September 2017
Using 21st Century Science for Risk-related evaluations: An Overview of the NAS Risk21 Report
Jonathan Samet, George Daston, & Lauren Zeise, On behalf of the National Academies Risk21 Committee
1 August 2017
Exposure‐Response in Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, from Receptors to Ecological Landscapes
Wayne G. Landis, Western Washington University
2 May 2017
Health and Economic Consequences of Endocrine Disruptors in the US and EU
Leo Transande, New York University
4 April 2017
Facilitated Discussion: Mentoring in Risk Assessment
2 February 2017